Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
Rehabilitation / Re: Diplopia
« Last post by Alex_Myopic on March 21, 2017, 03:44:07 PM »
I stood very lucky and noticed the following that supports more my claiming that diplopia in the last dioptre of rehab is astigmatism, exchanging dioptres for cylinders, principal meridians in the eye that don't come to emmetropic shape at the shame rate (?) or inner lens astigmatism that maybe due to the visual cortex not controlling the eye well.

I was watching tv and tilting my almost empty glass of water. Than starting playing and saw through the prism (glass) with my eye that has diplopia. I saw almost 20/20 with no diplopia and read letters that couldn't before, just looking through the glass! Then thought that the external and internal surface of the glass of water is CYLINDER, the same word for measuring astigmatism and the same surface as prisms-lenses for astigmatism!

My glass of water was almost empty, it was not big in diameter and I had to tilt it in order to look through only one layer of glass and not two(=through the whole tumbler).
Rehabilitation / Re: my journey from( -4.5 ,-4.5)
« Last post by sleepmaster4 on March 01, 2017, 01:52:28 PM »
If you're doing it right that's what the results should look like, quick shot down from the -4s to the low -3s then grind it down into the -1s.  I heard that Jake guy is at -1.75 from the -4s.

I'm not sure if it's possible to get to zero diopters from the -4s, but you worry about that after you get into the -1s and get your license vision restriction removed.
Rehabilitation / Re: my journey from( -4.5 ,-4.5)
« Last post by foie on February 21, 2017, 05:50:59 AM »
Hi kuber,  did you improve your eyesight ?  Did you do printpushing ?  See you soon !
Rehabilitation / Time of practice
« Last post by foie on February 20, 2017, 05:50:52 AM »
Hi everybody !  A little question:
If i practice 1 hour by day with print pushing or hart chart challenge,  could i improve faster than passive plus lens therapy ?  How many minutes by day practice  to wish 0.5 dioptrie improvement in 1 year ?  Cheers

News and Background / Re: Ben Rubin interviews Todd about hormesis
« Last post by OtisBrown on February 06, 2017, 07:32:26 AM »
I am an engineer, and Todd is a scientists.  Tragically, you will find that optometrists never take science seriously.  Here is the science and statistics - that confirm why Todd was, and is successful.  Success can only come from an educated parent.

For me, I no alternative.  If you are wise, and motivated, and will work to pass the DMV, then success is possible.
Personally - I will never trust an OD measurement. 

I do it myself.
Rehabilitation / Re: My tribute to an optometrist - who told me the truth.
« Last post by OtisBrown on January 30, 2017, 04:33:07 PM »
All I ever asked for - was that I be told scientific truth - while I was still able to read the 20/40  line -  and get myself back to 20/20.  But scientific truth is "tricky", the OD will tell you.  I know I made my choice, when I was at 20/40.

Yes - Todd was successful.
Because he did not, "hold back" on the wearing of a plus lens.
Because he resolved to PASS the only real requirement (Pass the 20/40 line - or better).
But people who demand 20/10 (that they always get from a strong minus lens) will most certainly become permanently myopic.

It is all a matter of your educated choice.
Thank you, Otis! I am so glad I came across all of these resources. At least it gives me hope we have a chance to improve my son's vision instead of submitting to passive acceptance of its annual deterioration. I feel like we have plateaued now between 20/50 and 20/40, but it's been only a month now and it's still better than being between 20/100 and 20/80.

We will continue following Todd's and your recommendations. I will post our updates. Thank you!
Hi 9yo Sun,
You are in a good position - if you continue to teach your child to 1) Sit up, 2) Read through a plus lens,  3)  Keep this up for all reading, 4) Accept that passing the 20/40 line (both eyes open) is a continued success.  There are brave ODs who call ODs, "researching myopia" - fradulent.  Here is the post by Dr. Maurice Brumer.

If I stated this - you would not believe me.  But this is an OD with 50  years experience.

I will never say, "cure", but only "intelligently avoid".  The "background fact" - is that our eyes, "go down" at a rate of -1/2 diopter per year - for each year we spend in school.  For those who, "object" to the plus - well they must understand that fact.

No OD will tell you this!  Because it would under-cut - the basis - of their entire profession.

Thank you, Otis! I am reading your "How to Avoid Nearsightedness" now.

The only time my son used the minus glasses was at that church event (Christmas pageant). He liked the way everything looked clear to him, that's true. But I talked to him after our "second opinion" visit to the ophthalmologist, we watched Todd Becker's presentation together, we decided to give the print pushing method a try and not wear those prescription minus glasses. The visits to optometrist and ophthalmologist left some bitter feelings in me. The first one ran his practice like a money mill. He literally spent about 10 minutes on us, then told me that if I had any further questions, his assistant would answer those while he had to see another patient waiting for him. Well, his assistant only wanted to sell, nothing else. And taking into consideration that this was the first case of myopia in our family on both sides, I had a lot of unanswered questions that day. After reading up on this condition and watching Todd's presentation, I was better prepared for the visit to the ophthalmologist. I was disappointed and confused to see a stronger prescription, but I was happy to hear when he confirmed that if I didn't want my son to wear those minus glasses, this would not hurt his vision. That was all I needed to hear to feel free to try Todd Becker's method. I didn't feel comfortable mentioning it to the doctor though. He was convinced that wearing any - minus or plus - would not cause any changes in vision. His idea was that my son's myopia would progress simply because his eyes will continue to grow, and no glasses would cause the condition to get better or worse.

We homeschool, so every time my son works on computer or reads anything, I have him wear plus glasses and I personally move his book or monitor about 2 inches back and forth between the areas when he can see the font clearly and not so clearly. We have taped marks on the floor for his chair and desk, we have marks on the desk to keep track of the distances when we do "print pushing". I think it's helping. Yesterday he felt comfortable reading 20/40 lines on 13ft Snellen chart. 20/20 was still too blurry though. But it's a huge improvement since we began. He also can see street and traffic signs clearer now. I hope to have confirmation of his vision improvement at his official annual eye check next year.

My main question is - looking at how fast my son moved from 20/80 to 20/40 - basically within 3 weeks of active print pushing - can this be because he has false myopia? Or is it a usual rate of improvement for this age/condition when using print pushing?
Hi 9Year -
I give "suggestions" to mature adults - at age 17.  It is very difficult to give advice to a parents or a child.  What we do know - is that  if your son starts wearing a strong minus - his refractive state will go down at a rate of -1/2 diopter per year.  Children wearing a strong plus - do not go down.  Here is the video discussion - and references.

The plus is not a "cure".  But used with wisdom (as Todd did it), it is possible to reach the 20/40 line  - on your home Snellen - and with continued motivated plus - slowly pass the 20/40 line (the only line a young child should be required to objectively pass.)

Enjoy the video.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10